Skip to main content

Music Tech Blog Post Week 2

Once again, I enjoyed this week's reading and lecture. This is partially because I am simply excited to be taking this course. I also enjoyed it because I am passionate about teaching composition within my classes. However, I am still working on the best way to integrate it into my ensembles without taking away from concert preparation.

Last year at my previous school, I utilized Noteflight and MuseScore within my school's subscription to MusicFirst. However, I did not get as in depth with the MuseScore software that was presented in the new tutorials. I simply had surface knowledge. Looking back, I should have utilized them as I would have spent less time on imputing examples from the band & choir curricula. I hope, as I move forward with my new position, I will be able to get another subscription to MusicFirst so I can continue improving my knowledge of Noteflight and MuseScore along with integrating them into compositional lessons.

If you are unfamiliar with MusicFirst, it is a cloud-based music software similar to SmartMusic. You can find their website here. I highly encourage you to explore what they have to offer. They have resources for K-12, which are simply amazing if you have a content and pedagogical purpose for them. This might be a great tool for you. I chose MusicFirst over SmartMusic for two main reasons: cost and the cloud-based technology. Cloud-based technology moves me into my discussion about Noteflight and its classroom application.

My previous school is 1:1 with technology. Junior High students have an iPad, and High School students have a SurfacePro. During class, students would bring their technology and be able to work on their assignments without having to have the software downloaded onto their computer. Through the classrooms set up in MusicFirst, there was a full subscription to Noteflight, I was able to assign composition exercises, and I could go and look at each of their individual and group compositions. With it being cloud-based, students could continue working at home from any device that had an internet connection. I found all three of those aspects to be invaluable, and more engaging for my students.

Comments

  1. Angel ColónNovember 4, 2017 at 6:56 PM

    I love how passionate you are about composing and feel so comfortable with the software to do it. In my district we have the technology available with site licenses to Sibelius and Finale but I have a hard time getting any time with a lab. I see that you are on a 1:1 ratio with technology and the district just north of use moved to that. I have heard both positives and negatives about this model. Do you feel there are more problems with the 1:1 in the classroom or does it enhance your instruction?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. UnknownNovember 8, 2017 at 7:01 AM

      I'm not necessarily sure there are more problems with a 1:1 ratio. There definitely are more problems when students have never been 1:1. However, I believe it is our job to teach them how to properly use their technology. When students understand expectations with the technology and proper consequences are in place/utilized, I find that there are few problems. It seems to me that when positive uses are put in place that there are fewer opportunities for technology to be used negatively (with exceptions of students who will make poor choices no matter the situation).

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

SmartMusic Review

Because Chromatik is no longer available, I thought I would compare SmartMusic & MusicFirst as they are both similar softwares that utilize the cloud. To begin my review, I wanted to look at the ultimate goals of both softwares. For easy reference, I have screen shots of both. SmartMusic: Guided Practice MusicFirst: K-12 Music Software Tools As you can see, SmartMusic places its focus on practice. MusicFirst has many different aspects that can be bundled together or used separately. MusicFirst has bundles based off grade levels and content areas: Elementary, Band/Chorus/Orchestra, Music Theory, and General Music. Similar to SmartMusic, MusicFirst has what is called PracticeFirst . So, let's compare SmartMusic and PracticeFirst. Smart Music gives very specific feedback to the students. As you can tell from the screen shot, it highlights notes & rests for the student. PracticeFirst is less specific than SmartMusic when it comes to identifying are...
Post a Comment
Read more

Music Tech Blog Post Week 6

This week's reading had several great reminders, and it also added much more in depth information on those topics as well! The emphasis on listening in the beginning of the chapter helped to put into context information that almost seems to be common sense.  For example, Bauer (2014) indicates that people listen to music at certain times like while in a car (p. 107).  He also discusses how students have a view of a separation of music at school and home.  Therefore , we must teach our students how to listen to better appreciate the difference rather than shoving it off as boring or unimportant. To me, listening seems like such an obscure skill to teach. It also is hard for me to generate assessments that would provide evidence for data tracking. However, I understand the importance especially when teaching elementary music. As stated in the text, I have used commercial listening resources at the elementary level. Dr. Denise  Gange  has wonderful  multi...
Post a Comment
Read more